June 18, 2025
Foreclosures have a reputation for offering favorable starting prices, but a low hammer price guarantees neither returns nor peace of mind. Whether an investment actually pays off depends on a number of objective and subjective factors. This guide helps you assess the most important ones before you raise your hand and clearly shows you when the risk outweighs the opportunities.
“Anyone who cannot finance the 20-day countdown should not bid at all.”
Deadline | Cash Requirement | Risk of Non-Compliance |
---|---|---|
Date of Award | 10% security deposit (estimated value) | Forfeiture + procedural costs |
+ 20 calendar days | Remaining purchase price + ancillary costs ≈ 3-5% | Award revoked, penalty |
+ 6 months | Renovation buffer ≥ 15% | Interim financing, stagnant capital |
Is the purchase worth it? Yes, if
• Interim loan signed
• Equity ratio ≥ 20% (FINMA)
• Reserves for interest rate hikes + surprise costs are available.
Are red cases worth it? Only if
• Hammer price is at least 40% below market value and
• you have extensive construction and time resources.
Avoid Purchase: High vacancy rate + stagnant labor market → difficult exit, shaky cash flow.
Stay away if …
• Usufruct is lifetime
• Building right 1st rank ≤ 40 years remaining term
• Contaminated sites “requiring remediation” without cost estimate.
Investor Profile | Suitable Properties | Better Avoid |
---|---|---|
“Flipper” (short-term) | Apartments with cosmetic needs | Core renovation + long-term tenants |
Cashflow Hunter | Multi-family homes 3-8 units, growth community | Single-family home in fringe location |
DIY Renovator | Single-family homes from the 70s, good substance | Listed buildings |
1. Does the project meet your minimum return even in the “+15% Costs” scenario?
2. Can you be liquid within 20 days?
3. Is the renovation technically and temporally manageable?
4. Does the property match your strategy & time capacity?
5. Are all legal risks (encumbrances, rental agreements) transparent?
House A (ZH-Suburbs): Year of construction 2002, minor cosmetic work, vacancy 0.7%. → Award of 1.05 million → Return 4.2% per annum. House B (FR-Countryside): Year of construction 1965, suspected contamination, vacancy 3%. → Award of 0.85 million → Renovation 0.35 million = Return 1.1% per annum. Outcome: House A is more profitable despite a higher price, House B rejected by the professional.
Whether a foreclosure is worthwhile is not determined by the lowest price, but rather the overall concept of liquidity, renovation, location, and legal clarity. Those who assess soberly, calculate realistically, and know their own strategy will seize the opportunity, all others would rather let the hammer fall before it becomes a costs' bludgeon.